Peter Archibong, Ph.D.

Information Technology

Teaching Philosophy

 “Let your aptitude, not your attitude determine your altitude.”

Jesse Jackson

 “Everyone can, wants, and deserves to learn”

 

How do I think learning occurs?

I believe that every student has the capacity (aptitude) to improve their way of thinking (attitude) to excel (altitude) in my classroom. I believe that students learn when they are exposed to different ways of understanding the material. Reading, elaboration through lectures and the presentation of diverse visual media, and discussions of the material, in addition to projects that require putting it all together, give every type of learner several ways to "get it." I think most students gain little from the testing process. They learn better and have a greater sense of accomplishment through the completion of complex projects that consolidate large areas of the material being covered.

I also believe that it is crucial to promote other kinds of learning than that related to the course material. Students should learn critical thinking through questions posed and discussed in class. The structure of projects should lead to improvement of social or soft skills. Projects that require classroom presentations can improve speaking skills and professionalism. Those done by groups of students can teach them how to get the best work from each member and the fine art of diplomacy.

How can I facilitate this process? How have I come to these conclusions?

I am very much “a-tech-savvy” type person who learns by doing and I believe that many people interested in basic computer skills and basic Internet technology, Networking infrastructure, and wireless connectivity are similar. I have a very practical, technical approach to the subject area. For this reason I really emphasize projects that incorporate large portions of the coursework.

What goals do I have for my students?

I want my students to leave my classes more "a-lighted-bulb" than when they came in. This does not mean that I see myself in their daily surfing of web!  My students tend to be those who are interested in basic computer skills to wireless security and Wi-Fi/wiMAX homeland security and they frequently have an idealized and simplistic view of what it means to work in those fields. I want them to question the ethics of the information technology industry: its labor practices, its wanton disregard for ethics in spreading viruses, and its promotion of beta software version. I want them to notice when PC World magazine advertisements use the principles of Gordon Moore’s law. Mr. Moore said that the number of components on a single silicon chip would continue to double every year (ScienCentral, 1999).  This means that the higher CPU-speed, the lower computer prices.  This concept is used by PC retailers to manipulate corporate consumers to replace last year’s computer system with state of the art high speed computers; thereby downplaying the grid computing technology of integrating disperse, heterogeneous systems to harness their unified processing power to save money on training and new equipment. This does not mean that I want my student to go out there and attempt to integrate dinosaurs systems in the information technology (IT) environment.  I want my student to understand that they can use critical thinking and evaluate what is in the best interest of the organization and IT environment for a better customer service.  I also, wanted my student to know that they can use IT research methodology to enhance software development and hardware infrastructure to create better World Wide Web where everyone can use peacefully, and do business without server outage.

I also want my students to understand the necessity for basic skills. IT students should be able to understand the physical hardware, software and virtual connectivity of wireless with integrated security and be able to communicate that knowledge through simple illustrations. Recognizing system performance, clustering servers and .999 system availability, are what I believe they should take home. These basics will give them the skills and the exploratory instinct to develop themselves when necessary to cope with the sporadic and volatile IT environment.

I want them to have a sense of history. Even if "there is no new thing under the sun," there will always be a technology change in the IT world. They must make the connections between today and the past in order to correctly interpret the trends. For example, the invention of electricity and first telegraph that gave birth to computer network and the need to count the population census that made IBM to invent punch card readers that evolved into computers.

What do I do to implement my plans/intentions?

I have a lot of enthusiasm for computer hardware and software assembling and network infrastructure: wired and wireless. Each can be a work of art, an object of daily, mundane use, and each can be both at the same time. I want my students to realize the extent to which computer hardware and software and Internet are a part of our lives. I want them to feel my enthusiasm and my commitment and to carry that forward in their own work. I try to create enthusiasm by using lots of visual media, especially slides from Internet/advertisements they may be familiar with in current personal computer magazines. With these tools I can ask them to critically analyze the need for Internet Protocols (IP) address sub netting at home as well as setting up one more computer upstairs using wireless router to expand their home networking system. I also show slides of historic event in the IT timeline whenever I can to illustrate connections between how fast computer technology has transformed the world and how we live and do business. I make their thoughts and opinions a big part of the class, with special emphasis on having the students think about why they feel a specific way and clearly articulating their explanations.

What goals have I set for myself as a teacher?

My first teaching assignment was an Introduction to Computers a required course for all students in every discipline. I assumed that every student should know at least how to turn on a computer in this class as the student I had in the Computer Network+ course. I was wrong, many of them could not even identify the power button, let alone pushing it to power up a computer. After the experience, I know now that I can not assume that every student is at the same skill level even though they are in the same class. In the past I used to teach the Introduction to microcomputers class using the one technique across the board; like I was used to in teaching complicated network sub-netting (creating Internet Protocol addresses) . I was very hard on that first group of students in my Introduction to Microcomputers!  Since then I have developed a more generous and assume-nothing philosophy with my students.

My goals are to continue to have empathy for my students and to identify the difficulties many of them encounter in their work to be educated.

To continue to find new ways to connect with my students and get them interested in the more complex questions associated with computer hardware-software, security and Internet.

“Let your aptitude, not your attitude determine your altitude.”

Jesse Jackson

 

Reference:

Hannel, S.  (2006).  Teaching Philosophy. Retrieved December 10, 2006 from http://ftad.osu.edu/portfolio/philosophy/Hannel-Cons&TextleSci.html 

ScienCentral (1999).  Gordon Moore. Retrieved December 10, 2006 from http://www.pbs.org/transistor/album1/moore/index.html